| ^ |
The Politics of Communion
That beautiful Lutheran woman, whose understanding was so much more Lutheran and less dogmatic, looked up at me from her chair - and laughed. My eyebrows went up. “What’s so funny?” “You don’t believe that,” she said. “Yes I do.” “No you don’t,” she replied. “If you do believe then why don’t you ever go to church?” |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Snyder Bible Home
All Sermons |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
070697 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To eat of His Flesh
and to drink of His Blood is as necessary for salvation as to believe in Him
who alone has seen the Father (v 47). The former is the inevitable corollary of
the latter. Then follows a further repetition of the provocative words, but substituting
munch for eat. This rather vulgar word . . . makes
the Saying more provocative still. No room is left for any “spiritualizing”
interpretation. The eating and drinking of the Flesh and Blood of the Son of
man involve a real physical eating and drinking, although the Flesh and Blood
are altogether misconceived if they be thought of, as the Jews are determined
to think of them, as the mere material of the human Body of Yahshua, instead of
being rigorously defined in terms of the significance wrought out and
manifested in His sacrificial death. The apparent contradiction implied in the
insistence that there must be a real physical eating and drinking of what is
grievously misunderstood if it is interpreted purely physically is resolved and
explained only if the conscious reference to the Eucharist is perceived .... As
the Father communicates life to the Son, so the Son communicates life to those
who feed on him, and will bestow on them immortality. It is now abundantly
clear that the incarnate Son of YHWH, the Son of man, is the Bread who came down
from heaven, and the manna is the type of the Son and of the Eucharistic Feast:
but only the type.[1]
1 John
5:1-15 read in the sermon.
John
6:52
So the Jews fought
toward one another saying, How is this man able to give his flesh to eat? 53 So Yahshua said to them, Amein, Amein, I
say to you, if you eat not the flesh of the Son of the man and drink not his
blood, you all have not life in yourselves.
54 The one eating of me the flesh and drinking of me the blood has
endless life and I will stand him up in the last day. 55 For the flesh of mine is true food and the blood of mine is
true drink. 56 The one eating the flesh
of mine and drinking the blood of mine remains in me and I in him. 57 And as the living Father sent me and I
live on account of the Father, so the one eating me, even that one, will live
because of me. 58 Such is the bread –
the one having descended out of the sky – not as the patriarchs ate and died. The one eating this bread will live unto the
endless age.
59
This he said in a synagogue in Ten Commandments Monuments
After years of preaching,
it seems natural that Holy Communion and Independence Day fall together once a
year. But to hear some people, a state
holiday and a holy day even sharing the same week should be illegal. They tell us church and state aren’t to mix
because someone might be offended – or because some church might take
over. I’m surprised that some groups
haven’t sued over Communion on Sunday and Independence Day on Monday, since
Communion comes the first day of the week and Independence the second: close
enough to be called state-sponsored religion.
A bizarre Church
/ State decision passed the Supreme Court last week. Three separate Ten Commandments monuments came before the court:
two in
To me, the
church / state dispute about Ten Commandments monuments isn’t of much
concern. I’d be more interested if
those involved actually kept the Ten
Commandments instead of simply debating them.
I feel confident in saying that neither the advocates of monuments nor
the judges who weigh the tablets of His laws keep them, for to break one is to break all, says the Apostle.
Furthermore, “anyone who says ‘I know him’
but disobeys his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him”
(I John
2:4).
That’s a fairly
hard saying. But the Apostle doesn’t
stop there:
Whoever believes
that Yahshua is the Anointed is a child of the Almighty, and whoever loves the
Father loves the son. In this way we know that we love His children, when we
love Him and keep His commandments.
This is what the love of the Almighty is all about: keeping his commandments …
because every child of the Almighty overcomes the world.
(1 John
5:1-4)
This pronouncement seems quite favorable to the mix of
faith and governance. Why so? Because theocracy is a heavenly government ruled by a benevolent
King who has designated us as emissaries to a yet untamed
world. The most obvious sign of our
heavenly allegiance and common affiliation is our rite of Holy Communion.
Church and State
Now as to the separation of church and state: Such is a 20th century
concept based on a few words of the first amendment to the Constitution:
Congress
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; {or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the
right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a
redress of grievances.}
Where in that statement do we find that impenetrable “wall
of separation”?
Those with the
bullhorn certainly see this imaginary wall: those with unlimited money out of
Consider the
recent “scandal” in the media about the Air Force Academy. One news source headlines the words, “Air
Force Academy Guilty of Religious Discrimination”; another writes, “Air Force
Academy Doing a Good Job for YHWH.” My
personal experience with Air Force Academy students has convinced me that these
men and women are some of the most dedicated and decent young people I’ve ever
known. Indeed, I agree with the latter
headline, “The Air Force Academy IS doing a Good Job.” Evidently, YHWH is still the co-pilot of many
young fliers.
Church and state
could no more be separated than bread and butter if the church is religion and the
state is politics. Politicians will
tell you that politics is a religion, just as churchmen affirm that religion is
political. Politics and religion are inseparable
– if intentions are right, one keeps the other honest. Honesty in government is the way of Heaven –
but not the way of humankind.
You and I are
seeking a soon-coming theocracy - a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT ruled solely by
Heaven’s child - the scion of David. We’ve
lived under antichrist long enough – over
six thousand years. Yahshua and his
Host will soon return and that will end the church / state debate. While we await Him, let me remind you that,
as long as we await him watchfully and actively, then the Kingdom is already
here – we live each day by the commander’s truths, rulings and ordinances. We’re in this world, but we’ve claimed to be
no longer OF it. Our allegiance is to another world - for “My kingdom,” quoth
he, “is not of this world.” Our lives are politically locked into the Eternal Word.
I Pledge Allegiance
When we pledge
allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, we understand our
fidelity in terms of covenant - we’ll be loyal to the constitution of
our country, we’ll fight when sent forth (whether we agree or not), we’ll stand
behind our leaders, and we’ll not betray our nation to its enemies. It takes HUGE faith to pledge allegiance to
a polyester symbol! Yet we vow
ourselves to the state with a sacred, yeah religious, vow: We give ourselves
over to the Republic for which it stands.[2]
The Republic has
great military might to defend “we the people.” The vestiges of its might are
all about us. During hurricane Ivan,
“we the people” got a first-hand look at the compassion of our forces; the
national guard made “we the people” feel secure and saved hundreds of
lives. Military might through the lens
of natural disaster was quite different than through the lens of Shock and Awe;
however, again “we the people” feel secure in knowing that the weapons of our
warfare are the most awesome on earth.
How could the
However, in a
few minutes we Americans will pledge allegiance to a different Kingdom – one in
which no tangible power can be observed by eye nor perceived by intellect. The
King of that place rules behind the scenes, unlike our popular president in
Isaiah 57:15,16,19 For thus says the
high and lofty One who inhabits eternity, whose name is Holy: “I dwell in the
high and holy place, and also with him who is of a repentant and humble spirit,
to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the
repentant. For I will not contend
forever, nor be angry; for from me proceeds the spirit, and I have made the
breath of life. Peace, peace, to the
far and to the near, says Yahweh; and I will heal [you].”
The Pledge to His
Kingdom
Yes, a healing
is required to attain citizenship of this great Kingdom; no written test will
do. One must be born again from above –
for what is flesh is flesh and what is spirit is spirit, and flesh can’t
rightly inhabit the unseen Kingdom. His
Holy Constitution must be diligently kept, precept upon precept, as a pledge of
allegiance to his Sovereignty and his Monarchy. Thus we pledge not in words only,
but in spiritual worship and mysterious rituals: the primary rite is recorded
in Matthew 26:26-29:
The King took bread, gave thanks
and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, “Take and eat; this is my body. Do this in remembrance of me.”
Kingdom sisters and brothers, we eat and drink HIM even as
we eat and drink TO him.
From the very
first, this EATING has been considered more than controversial; it’s
been deemed an act of treason - uncivil, irreligious, against country and
common sense. The source of the
controversy is the bold words of the Ever-living King himself:
(John 6:53-56) I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son
of Man and drink his blood, you are not even alive; but whoever eats my flesh
and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.
For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink.
This is a
radical, political concept – bulldozing a vast breach in the dividing wall
between church and state: Would we pledge allegiance to an invisible King of a
state in an alternate reality by turning bread into flesh and wine into blood,
then eating and drinking flesh and blood in a pledge of allegiance to that
which can’t even be seen? It’s absurd.
It’s no wonder history records that “From this time many of his political
allies turned back and no longer followed him.”
The Food and Drink
of the Heavenly Republic
How does that
strike you? Do we ever consider what
kind of cosmic statement we make when, centuries and centuries later, we fall
upon our knees to eat and drink Him? Do we consider the radical claims we make
when we consume a Man in this manner? Or has it just become ritualized to the
point to which the King is no longer able to form himself into the tiny
elements we consume, nor be digested into the tiny blood cells that
circumnavigate our bodies? Have we the faith anymore? Is what the King told us about his body and blood considered
truth anymore? Do we believe him? Do you believe him? As someone said to me Wednesday night, then PROVE
IT!
One Catholic
writer relates a discussion he had with his new Lutheran wife about this very
matter:
We never argued about religion,
that beautiful Lutheran woman and I. We did have many discussions, especially
in those first two years of marriage. Once she asked me to explain the
difference between Lutheran and Catholic teachings on the Lord’s Supper. I dug
up a copy of Luther and paced the floor and I quoted that the sacrament “is the
true body and blood of our Lord Yahshua Christ under the disguise of bread and
wine....” Then I pulled down my old Catholic Catechism and read: “After the
substance of the bread and wine had been changed into the substance of the body
and blood of our Lord there remained only appearances of bread and wine.”
Catholics, I explained, believe that the Real Presence means Yahshua is there -
body, blood, soul, and divinity - and there’s no longer a crumb we can call
bread or a drop we can call wine. That beautiful Lutheran woman, whose understanding was so much more Lutheran and less dogmatic, looked up at me from her chair - and laughed. My eyebrows went up. “What’s so funny?” “You don’t believe that,” she said. “Yes I do.” “No you don’t,” she replied. “If you do believe that Yahshua is there in the bread and the wine, all body, soul, spirit, flesh, blood, humanity and divinity, and that there’s no longer a crumb we can call bread or a drop we can call wine, then why don’t you ever go to church?”[3] {OOO! That hurts!}
Eating a Man in
a sacrament is a radical concept. It’s
a fine design for mind-eating only - some philosophical or symbolic kind of
eating. But when we come to kneel and
receive, won’t the actual body and blood of Yahshua fit into our hands, on our
lips, against our tongues, down our throats into the abyss of our stomachs, to
be digested and invested in our flesh and blood and being? Yes, he will, in a spiritual sense, by
faith. And do we really experience the
transformation of the heavenly nutrients at the cellular level? And do we really appreciate our
transmutation from the principality known as The Dominion of Darkness to the
New Eden of the Son? We can; we should.
To acknowledge
these extreme concepts by faith in HIS Word is a great deal of what it
takes to actually, truly believe. And
if we truly believe, why don’t we put aside our pitiful excuses so as to come
and eat him gratefully when he’s served?
And why don’t we serve his body every Sunday - or every single
day of the week, for that matter, in both our chapels, homes and
hearts? If the Almighty so strongly
witnesses to this practice - even to the extent of commanding it - then
shouldn’t we believe him and obey his call to eat and drink?
The Final Promise
Anyone may come
who’ll believe it all about him, have utmost faith in him, venture
toward abiding in him, and utterly consume him. It takes a lot of faith for that – more than faith – it takes a
new birth. One who was a gallant friend
of the King writes to us one last testament about Him that we need to hear –
and it’s purely church and state, my friend.
The Beloved Disciple writes:
1 John 5:13-15 I write these
things to you who believe in the name of the Son of Yahweh so that you may know
that you have eternal life. This is the confidence we have in
approaching the Almighty: that if we ask anything according to his will,
he hears us. And if we know that he hears us - whatever we ask - we know that we
have what we asked of him.
Just like the
promise spoken from the mouths of political hopefuls for two hundred
twenty-nine years. “I’ll give you anything you want, if you’ll vote for
me.” The difference here is that the
promise comes not come from the mouth of a lying campaigner, but from the One
who’s utterly incapable of lying.
Prepare your heart now to receive a Kingdom, that which was established
for you upon Love in Light from the foundation of the world – where the
separation of church and state vanishes because the King, to you my friend,
appears in all love and power. Amein.
Father, may we as nation be guided by the Divine to rediscover our
national heritage, which so many have given their lives to safeguard; Let the
wounds of separation and division be healed by opening our hearts to listen to
the truth, allowing us to find a higher truth; May we learn to honor and enjoy
our differences as a people, even as we more deeply touch our fundamental
unity; May we draw forth individuals to lead our nation who embody courage,
compassion and a higher vision; May our leaders inspire us, and we so inspire
each other that a new spirit of forgiveness, caring and honesty be born herein;
May we move with clear, directed purpose to help build a better future for all
humankind; May we as a nation rededicate ourselves to living as one nation,
under YHWH, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all; And may Yahweh’s Will
be done for our country, as we, the people, align with that Will. Amein. ADDENDUM The Witness of YHWH and its Consequences This is the Spirit of YHWH’s witness as to the man we come today
to eat - and the Spirit’s witness to Yahshua is twofold:
(1 John
5:6) He came by water and blood. He
did not come by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who
testifies, because the Spirit is the truth.
Social Security and Eternal Security The Beloved Disciple, our writer, knew Yahshua, and had eaten
Yahshua’ body and drunk his blood from Yahshua’ own hand. But John confesses his
testimony is inferior, and asks you now to receive Yahweh’s own testimony about
the matter:
1
John 5:9-12 We accept man’s testimony, but the Almighty’s testimony is greater
because it is the testimony of Yahweh, which he has given about his Son. Anyone
who believes in the Son of Yahweh has this testimony in his heart. Anyone who
does not believe Yahweh has made him out to be a liar, because he has not
believed the testimony Yahweh has given about his Son. And this is the testimony: the Almighty has
given us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He who has the Son has
life; he who does not have the Son of Yahweh does not have life. The testimony of the Almighty implies that if you want financial
or physical security in this world there’s a good place to rely on and believe
in - I’m talking about the government of the Whoever abides in the Son has life; whoever doesn’t has death.
Friends, even our government and its President haven’t made you such an
outrageous promise. But in the Kingdom, life is more that a promise, it is a
pledge from Him to you, and ultimately a privilege that literally tens of millions
have believed and died for - and now enjoy. When death comes to visit our
families, we know that the saying is true. Choose what allegiance you’ll pledge
today; choose which president you’ll serve.
Choose what promises you’ll believe. Choose rightly and you will choose
the Kingdom of the Beloved Son, one nation under YHWH, indivisible, with liberty
and justice for all.
[1] Hoskins quoted in Peter F. Ellis, The Genius of
John: A Composition-Critical Commentary on the Fourth Gospel, 127.
[2] Friends,
the Republic is us: “we the people” of the United States of
America, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, provide for
the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of
liberty for ourselves and our posterity do ordain and establish this
Constitution of the United States of America. [3] Mike Aquilina. |