TO JOIN RABBI LEFF'S EMAIL LIST, ENTER YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW


Powered by FeedBlitz


home (Reb Barry's blog)

Torah Commentaries           

Teshuvot -- Jewish legal opinions

Op-ed pieces

Other writings

Links

About Rabbi Leff 

                 

 

Rabbi Barry Leff Digest
Number  135  Date 111805

Back to Divrei Torah (Torah Commentaries)
Back to  Snyder Bible

Topics in this digest:  Yom Kippur 5766
By Rabbi Dr. Barry Leff
Congregation B’nai Israel
Toledo, OH


NOTE: To register for the World Zionist Congress election, or for more information on Mercaz, go their website: www.mercazusa.org


This past summer I sat in a living room in Neveh Dekalim, a Jewish settlement in Gaza which no longer exists, and watched a clash between two competing visions of Zionism.

One of the Gaza residents told us that her husband grew up in a house that used to belong to an Arab in Ashkelon, a city south of Tel Aviv which has always been part of Israel. She said “what’s the difference? Why should we have to give up Neveh Dekalim, but we get to keep Ashkelon?” To her, all of Israel from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea belongs to Israel, there is no difference between Tel Aviv and Gaza, and if we’re entitled to any of it we’re entitled to all of it.

“Why should anyone lose their child so you can live here, surrounded by millions of Arabs who hate you?” was the heated response from an older secular Israeli who lost a child serving in the Israeli Defense Forces.
One of the other visitors said “as painful as the disengagement is for you, are you totally incapable of seeing the pain of the Palestinians?”

The demonstrations, for the moment, are over. The disengagement is a fait accompli. Despite the settlers’ fervent prayers, the Messiah did not come, Ariel Sharon did not change his mind, the soldiers obeyed their orders.

But that doesn’t mean the struggle for Israel’s soul is over. The fault line is still there, running deep in Israeli society. Those who were opposed to the disengagement are catching their breath and preparing themselves for the next phase in the struggle—the settlements in the West Bank.

A withdrawal from many of the settlements in the West Bank probably won’t come too soon—everyone in Israel is still trying to recover from the pain and cost of the disengagement from Gaza. But it will come eventually.
Either as a part of a negotiated peace agreement with the Palestinians, or as a part of Sharon’s unilateral disengagement strategy, but it will come.
And when it does, I fear for Israel. Unlike Gaza which never was part of the Biblical Israel, the land of the West Bank was all part of ancient Judea and Samaria. The attachment to the land runs far deeper, there are many more settlements, and they are more geographically dispersed. When the time comes to withdraw to militarily defensible borders in the West Bank, the turmoil is going to be tremendous.

Both sides in this debate – the religious Zionists clinging to the land on the one hand, and the secular Zionists clinging to a vision of peace on the other hand – believe THEY are the REAL Zionists, and the other people have tarnished the vision of Zionism.

Who’s right? Will the real Zionists please stand up?

Jews have always had a strong connection to the land of Israel. In the weekday Amidah, which the observant Jew recites three times a day, we ask God to restore our people to Israel. Every weekday we ask God to “Sound the great shofar to herald our freedom, raise high the banner to gather our exiles. Gather us together from the ends of the earth. Praised are you Lord, who gathers the dispersed of his people Israel.”

Our prayers don’t tell us when we should go to Israel, if we all need to go at once, and our prayers don’t tell us what the borders of Israel should be. Even though our prayers don’t specify the borders of Israel, they do remind us to raise our eyes to Zion—Jerusalem—for Torah comes forth from Zion.

For almost two thousand years, most Jews believed that this prayer meant that one day God would send the Messiah and somehow we would all magically be transported to the holy land.

Waiting for the Messiah to come and bring us home required a great deal of patience. They say that the town of Chelm in Poland hired a watchman, so that if the Messiah came in the middle of the night he could run around and wake everyone up and let them know the good news. The job didn’t pay very well, but it was steady work!

A little over a hundred years ago, some Jews got tired of waiting. In
1897 Theodore Herzl convened the first Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland. The 200 delegates were mostly secular Jews from Europe, convinced that Jews would always suffer from anti-Semitism unless they had a home of their own. They were not religious Jews responding to the call of Zion—they briefly even considered establishing a Jewish state in Africa. They were motivated by a desire to live in dignity in a place where Jews could ply any profession, belong to any country club, serve at all levels of government. They were tired of being second class citizens wherever they lived.

After substantial debate, the delegates agreed on a statement of the key principle of Zionism: "The aim of Zionism is to create for the Jewish people a home in Eretz Yisrael secured by law."

Even this idea—that we shouldn’t just wait for God but we should go ahead and work to bring the Jewish people home on our own, was controversial in its day. The vast majority of Orthodox Jews didn’t support it because they believed we shouldn’t try to “push God’s hand.” They believed we should wait for God to bring us home when the Messiah comes. Many Reform Jews didn’t support the idea, because at that time they believed they were transcending narrow nationalism by striving for acceptance among the nations. Reform writings from the time even say the exile from Israel was a good thing, because we couldn’t be a light to the other nations if we weren’t living among them. The first of the major movements to embrace the idea of Zionism was actually our own Conservative movement. In 1906, Solomon Schechter, one of the guiding lights of the Conservative movement said “Zionism is the Declaration of Jewish Independence from all kinds of slavery, whether material or spiritual.” Schechter also believed that Zionism was a positive force because it brought a lot of Jews who previously had no interested in Judaism back into the Jewish fold, even sparking an interest in religion in some of them.


The founding generation in the Zionist movement, the ones that “did the heavy lifting,” who made aliyah and built organizations like the Jewish Agency and Histradut were mostly secular Jews from Eastern Europe, Jews fleeing persecution. Hence their vision for Israel was as a haven to escape anti-Semitism—not as a place to fulfill Messianic expectations.

Even though most of the founders of Israel were not religious, they felt a sort of spiritual connection to the land, they felt a sense of mission, and they felt a connection to the Torah as a repository of the Jewish people’s history. They were idealists, in the words of A.D. Gordon: “As we now come to re-establish our path among the ways of living nations of the earth, we must make sure that we find the right path. We must create a new people, a human people whose attitude toward other peoples is informed with the sense of human brotherhood and whose attitude toward nature and all within it is inspired by noble urges of life-loving creativity. All the forces of our history, all the pain that has accumulated in our national soul, seem to impel us in that direction... we are engaged in a creative endeavor the like of which is itself not to be found in the whole history of mankind: the rebirth and rehabilitation of a people that has been uprooted and scattered to the winds...”

Members of Israel’s Labor Party are the spiritual descendants of A.D.
Gordon’s philosophy. They have a vision of Israel as more than just a home for Jews, but as a place where we apply the moral vision of Judaism.
These Labor Zionists are not so concerned with the exact borders of that land—after all, Ben-Gurion agreed to the UN Partition Plan in 1947, which would have left them with a much smaller Israel, and with Jerusalem under international control.

The attitude of today’s secular Zionists is most eloquently expressed by the famous Israeli author, A.B. Yehoshua: “We, who love our homeland and suffice with the Land of Israel inside the Green Line, are regarded by the opponents of the disengagement plan as alienated folks who have betrayed the 'Land of Israel' of the Zionist vision.” Yehoshua analyzes how much land is in Israel, how much in the West Bank, and how much is not currently populated by Palestinians—and he concludes that the whole battle is over what to do with eight percent of the western land of Israel—a large part of which is the Judean desert, as if Israel lacks for desert. He continues “And because of that small area, the opponents of disengagement want to stay in this bloody cycle, and to pollute Zionism, to drag themselves over the rocks, to paralyze the state and to threaten a civil war?... The God that governs these people's hearts and guides their action is a god of 'quantity of soil.' A tragic and absurd degeneration of the Jewish spirituality of yore.”

If the secular Zionists are clearly the spiritual descendants of the founders of the Zionist movement and the founders of the state of Israel, from where do the religious Zionists draw their claim that THEY are the REAL Zionists? Why are they so obsessed with holding onto every square inch of the land of Israel?


At first, the vast majority of Orthodox rabbis were opposed to Zionism and the establishment of the state of Israel. One exception was the man who is considered the founder of religious Zionism--Rabbi Avraham Yitzchak haKohen Kook, appointed the first Ashkenazi chief rabbi of Israel in 1921. Like the secularists from Ukraine and Poland, Rabbi Kook believed that all Jews should move to Israel—but for a completely different reason. Rabbi Kook wrote “Apart from the nourishment it receives from the life-giving Jew of the holiness of Eretz Yisrael, Jewry in the Diaspora has no real foundation and lives only by the power of a vision, and by the memory of our glory, i:e., by the past and the future. But there is a limit to the power of such a vision to carry the burden of life and to give direction to the career of a people-and this limit seems already to have been reached. Diaspora Jewry is therefore disintegrating at an alarming rate, and there is no hope for it unless it replants itself by the wellspring of real life, of inherent sanctity, which can be found only in Eretz Yisrael.”

The secular Zionists said there was no hope for Jews living in the Diaspora; Rabbi Kook said there is no hope for Judaism living in the Diaspora.

For the religious Zionists, settling the land of Israel is not primarily about escaping anti-Semitism. It’s primarily about fulfilling the prophecies that the Jewish people should be restored to their land, and about fulfilling commandments to live in Israel and to settle the land of Israel.

In the early days, most religious Zionists saw the state of Israel as neutral in regards the coming of the Messiah. Maybe it would help the eventual redemption, maybe not. They also weren’t too worried about the exact borders of Israel. Most agreed with the various negotiations that resulted in Israel’s borders.

All of that started to change in 1967—after Israel regained Biblically important lands in Judea and Samaria, as well as the land in the Gaza Strip. A more radical strand came to the fore—Gush Emunim, Bloc of the Faithful, who believe that the creation of the state of Israel IS the
start of the redemption process. Not only that, but they therefore
believe it is our divine destiny to hang on to every inch of the land of Israel.

The Gush Emunim rely heavily on the first comment by the great rabbi Rashi in the Torah. Rashi asks why does the Torah start with the book of Genesis? Why not start with Exodus, which really tells the story of the Jewish people, where we are given the Torah at Mt. Sinai? His answer is that Genesis is part of the Torah in order to teach that “God has showed His people the power of His works, that He may give them the heritage of the nations" As Gush Emunim and its sympathizers understand it, this means "that the promise of the entire land of Israel is a pledge of absolute divine validity. No moral consideration can stand against it, and any Arab national rights have no weight against it."

The Gush Emunim—and their successor, the “Yesha Council”—have come to believe that it is a sin to give up an inch of land in “greater Israel,”
without regard to how many people will die defending that land, without regard to world opinion, and certainly without regard to the feelings or situation of any Arabs currently living on that land. Their rabbis like to quote Numbers 33:53, “And you shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and live in it; for I have given you the land to possess it.”

Today Israel is in tremendous conflict because of a head-on clash between these two competing visions of Zionism: the religious Zionists insist that to give up an inch of land is forbidden by halacha, it goes against God’s will and promises to the Jewish people, and it’s foolhardy to boot. The secular Zionists insist that peace is more important than land, we have no business oppressing other people, and the sooner we get out of the West Bank and let the Palestinians have a country, the better.

Most of the time, those of us living outside of Israel can only sit on the sidelines and watch what happens politically in Israel. This year is different. This year we have a vote.

The World Zionist Congress convenes once every four years. It’s a meeting of the World Zionist Organization or WZO, the organization founded by Theodore Herzl in Basel in 1897. The WZO controls a large portion of the hundreds of millions of dollars spent every year by the Jewish Agency.
The representatives to the WZO determine how that money will be spent.
Every Jew over the age of 18 who supports the idea of Israel as a Jewish state is eligible to vote for who represents him or her at this Congress.
You can register to vote by mail or online, it only costs $7, and it only takes about 5 minutes.

There are 500 voting delegates to the Congress which will convene next June. 145 of them come from the US. Your vote helps determine the makeup of that 145. In the last Congress, 32 of the representatives came from the Conservative movement.

In this election, you do not have to vote for either a secular vision which sees religion as unimportant, or a religious vision which values land over lives. You can vote for a third way. What you vote for is who will represent you at the Congress—and you can vote for the Zionism of Mercaz USA, which represents the Conservative movement at the Congress.

If religious Zionism is founded on the teachings of Rav Kook and secular Zionism on the teachings A.D. Gordon, the Zionism of Mercaz could be said to be based on the teachings of Ahad Haam. Ahad Haam was an advocate for a strong two-way relationship between Israel and the Diaspora, where each nourished the other. Shortly after the First Zionist Congress, he wrote:
“This Jewish settlement, … will become in course of time the centre of the nation, wherein its spirit will find pure expression and develop in all its aspects up to the highest degree of perfection of which it is capable.
Then from this centre the spirit of Judaism will go forth to …all the communities of the Diaspora, and will breathe new life into them and
preserve their unity.” Mercaz shares Ahad Haam’s vision of Israel and
the Diaspora culturally and spiritually nourishing each other.

We know the power that Israel can have on our young people. Kids who go on USY Pilgrimage come home infused with energy and enthusiasm, proud of their Judaism. Programs Mercaz supports, like bringing young Israelis to Toledo to work as camp counselors, benefit both us and them. Our kids had a great time learning Israeli songs and cultures from young people like Ayelet, who stayed with us for a few weeks this summer. And Ayelet had her eyes opened to a completely different way of being Jewish – she never knew there was such a thing as a Jewish woman who keeps kosher and wears short pants in the summer!

If the religious Zionists base their concept of the land on the first Rashi in the Torah, one might say that Mercaz’s form of Zionism bases its concept of the land on Nachmanides’ first comment. Nachmanides says that the Book of Genesis as a whole is there to teach us that our hold on the land is conditional on our obedience to the word of God. As Uriel Simon said in an essay, "There is a need for this warning, for clinging to the dangerous delusion that God will be on our side unconditionally, by virtue of our covenant with Him, may lead us to sin.” We cannot hold on to all of the land of Israel at the price of shedding unnecessary blood, at the price of oppressing other people, at the price of forgetting that the Torah commands us to treat the stranger kindly for we were strangers. MERCAZ USA has consistently supported all of the Israeli government’s peace efforts founded on the principle of trading territory for security. Mercaz also demands that the Palestinians carry out their obligations to stop violence, arrest terrorists and eliminate incitement as found today in Palestinian textbooks, curricula and sermons.

In line with a vision of Israel committed to principles from the Torah, it seems that in the rush to build a country, some important principles have been left behind—the commandment not to turn our eyes from our poor brother, and the commandment of bal taschit, not to damage the environment, for example. Mercaz supports social justice and protecting the environment.

Israel is a land that belongs to all Jews, not just Orthodox Jews. In a letter to the First Zionist Congress Rabbi Mohiliver wrote: "For the success of this assembly it is necessary to establish that all the "Sons of Zion" whose hearts are loyal to our cause should live together in complete love and brotherhood, even though they are in conflict as to matters between man and God.”

Sadly, today in Israel the government takes sides in matters that are between man and God. The secular Zionists who founded Israel were not very concerned about religion. Coming from Eastern Europe, they knew nothing of Reform or Conservative Judaism. In my opinion, one of the biggest mistakes those pioneering Zionists made was to give the Orthodox a monopoly on religion in Israel.

Conservative and Reform rabbis are not allowed to perform legally recognized weddings or conversions in Israel. The government provides a vast amount of funding for Orthodox institutions, and virtually nothing for Reform or Conservative institutions.

MERCAZ contends that the government of Israel should not be in the business of maintaining and financing only one form of Judaism. Rather, it should support all forms of Jewish life. Religious pluralism, the right of every Israeli Jew to choose his/her Jewish lifestyle, is ultimately a matter of equal civil rights for all men and women. WZO can direct that money from the Jewish Agency go to support pluralism in religious expression in Israel.

We believe pluralism is important not just because we want “our cut of the pie.” But we believe that Israel desperately needs our vision of Judaism—Judaism solidly rooted in tradition and halacha while at the same time participating fully in the secular world. The past President of the Conservative movement in Israel, Ehud Bandel, said that most Israelis are Conservative Jews, they just don’t know it yet.

According to one recent survey, over a third of Israelis said they would go to High Holiday services at a Reform or Conservative synagogue if there was one in their neighborhood. For most Israelis, there isn’t. Israel and the US have about the same number of Jews – yet there are 800 Conservative synagogues in the US and only 50 in Israel. A lot of what’s holding us back is money. It’s very tough to raise money to build synagogues and pay rabbi’s salaries when Orthodox synagogues and rabbi’s salaries are paid for by the State.

We have made progress—50 congregations is a lot more than we had 20 years ago—in part thanks to those who took the time to register for Zionist Congresses in the past who voted for Mercaz. Thanks to the funding Mercaz representatives have been able to secure, we have Israelis enriching our children’s lives at Camp Ramah and USY Conventions. Future leaders of American Jewry are studying in Israel on the USY Nativ program, spending time on a Kibbutz, learning at Hebrew University, seeing Israel from a modern, Conservative perspective. These are the kids who will come home and stand up to the anti-Israel Arab propaganda which is flooding our college campuses. And they are supported by funds from the Jewish Agency which are the result of votes for Mercaz.

Fliers with information on how to register for the World Zionist Congress election can be found on the tables in the entry hallway to the sanctuary.

In Pirkei Avot, Hillel says "If I am not for myself, who is for me? and if I am only for myself, what am I? and if not now, when? Mercaz supports us, and it supports an inclusive vision of Zionism. And now is the time to support them.

In the last election for the World Zionist Congress, only 110,000 people voted. 2% of the Jews in America voted. If everyone in B’nai Israel voted, it would be almost enough to send another Mercaz delegate to the Congress. Your vote makes a big difference.

May God grant the leaders of Israel the strength, wisdom, and courage to bring about an era of living Zionism which sees Israel at peace with her neighbors, an Israel where all ways of practicing Judaism receive equal support. May God help us realize Rabbi Mohliver’s vision of an Israel where all “Sons of Zion whose hearts are loyal to our cause live together in complete love and brotherhood, even though they are in conflict as to matters between man and God.”

Amen



To view the archives, go to www.neshamah.net

 

 

Top of page